26 July at 2:00 PM Eastern (US)

As heavily relied upon as critical path method (CPM) is, there exists a gap for more detailed communication across project personas and teams. This is precisely why the need arises to use a combination of CPM and short-interval planning (SIP) with the goal of increasing communication and efficiency, leading to a stronger understanding of project deliveries.

Primary Discussion Topics:

• Define CPM vs SIP (AACE levels of schedule
• Outline various groups reliant on schedule information
• Typical gaps in methodologies
• Importance of aligning your short interval plan to your CPM schedule for stakeholder communication
• How technology can solution the problem

Learning Objectives:

• Importance of aligning your short interval plan to your CPM schedule for stakeholder communication
• How technology can solution the problem
• Learn about methods of interface planning

Presenters:

Nate St. John, Product Director for Schedule, Risk, & Design, InEight

Jordan Brooks, Product Manager, Schedule, Risk & Design, InEight

AACE Host:

Ken Cressman, CCP EVP

Registration is required, so take a minute to register in advance so you don’t miss a minute of what should be a great presentation.

This webinar is generously sponsored by InEight. This webinar is CEU eligible. Attendees will be awarded 0.1 CEUs.